ZDT COFFEE HOUR SUNDAY, STORMS, 400lb of PATHETIC [ZeroDarkTony] / October 11, 2026 / YouTube / qPAz-qHHgTo
D’Amato also states he sent videos to attorney Kendrick Moxon and separately outlines a judgment-collection strategy tied to ongoing litigation.
Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr., also known as ZeroDarkTony, used an October 11, 2026 YouTube livestream to ask his audience to contact a prosecutor he identified as “Goldman” and report that Scott Hochstetter, known as “DOA,” had allegedly attended a Scientology event where a person named Janet (likely Janet Weiland, longtime executive within Scientology’s Office of Special Affairs) was present. D’Amato framed the alleged proximity as a possible restraining-order violation. He also stated he had already forwarded videos to Scientology attorney Kendrick Moxon and separately discussed pending litigation against Scott, including anticipated judgment collection and contempt consequences.
“I want them to put him under the fucking jail”
D’Amato’s requests to contact the prosecutor were explicit but layered with hedges. He repeatedly said he would not make the contact himself while directing the audience to do so, and he acknowledged uncertainty about the actual terms of any order: “I don’t know if there’s anything about personnel or any specific person he’s not supposed to be near.” He nonetheless named a prosecutor, described the desired action, and told viewers with an existing relationship with that office to act on it. Alongside the prosecutor-contact requests, D’Amato addressed Scott’s ongoing court matters, stating a next hearing date of December 1 and describing how he expected discovery and payment-enforcement proceedings to unfold if Scott lost his appeal.
Exhibit A
D’Amato tells his audience, “Email Goldman and tell him that Scott was at an event that Janet was at. That’s what you do,” then immediately adds, “And I’m not trying to get anybody put in a cage. I want them to put him under the fucking jail.” He acknowledges uncertainty about the order’s terms in the same passage: “I don’t know if there’s anything about personnel or any specific person he’s not supposed to be near, but… notify the prosecutor, let them figure it out.”
Timestamps: 00:26:49 – 00:32:51 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato solicits contact with a named prosecutor from audience members he describes as already having “some kind of maybe rapport” with that office, framing the request as optional while closing with “So get on it.” He also states that he sent videos to Moxon and credits that as “part of the catalyst of him being in the situation he’s in now.” The clip establishes a six-minute sequence in which D’Amato repeatedly returns to the prosecutor-contact request while acknowledging he does not know whether Scott’s order actually prohibits proximity to Janet.
Exhibit B
Immediately after the prosecutor-contact segment, D’Amato states he has already acted on his own: “I’m going to drop a little note to Kendrick Moxon. In fact, I just did. I just dropped a little note to Kendrick Moxon to tell him what you did yesterday. And he’s going to make sure that if there is a problem, he’s going to solve it.”
Timestamps: 00:34:23 – 00:36:20 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states he contacted Moxon during the live broadcast itself, describing it as informing the attorney of conduct from the day prior. He also names Scott’s next court date as December 1. The clip documents that D’Amato was not only soliciting audience action but was simultaneously taking his own steps to notify legal counsel.
Exhibit C
Turning to the pending appeal, D’Amato addresses Scott directly on stream: “If you do happen to win a couple bucks from Clearwater or Francois and we win that appeal for the $18,000, that’s my money and we’ll get it.” He adds, “And we have him on video saying, oh, I’m not going to pay it. And we’re going to show that to the judge.”
Timestamps: 00:37:38 – 00:39:35 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states he intends to use a video of Scott’s own statements as evidence before a judge and describes an $18,000 legal-fee appeal as one he expects to win. He clarifies that any resulting judgment would technically belong to his attorney, not him personally. The clip documents D’Amato’s on-stream account of his litigation posture and the evidence he claims he has gathered.
Exhibit D
D’Amato explains what he expects to follow if Scott loses the appeal and then misses a payment: “If you make an agreement to pay something to a court and you don’t fulfill that obligation, the second that you’re late, you owe the whole amount, and its contempt.” He also describes full financial discovery as a consequence: “He’s going to get a lot of people involved in this shit when it comes down to discovery.”
Timestamps: 00:44:46 – 00:49:57 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato walks through contempt-of-court mechanics and discovery exposure on stream, framing both as outcomes he anticipates and welcomes. He also references Scott’s “IRS situation” in passing without elaborating. The clip shows D’Amato presenting detailed legal analysis of Scott’s potential vulnerabilities as part of the same broadcast in which he solicited prosecutor contact. Taken together, the four clips document a continuous stream in which D’Amato solicited audience contact with a named prosecutor, stated he had personally notified an attorney mid-broadcast, and described the litigation and enforcement tools he expects to deploy at Scott’s December 1 court date and beyond.
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Text Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Chat Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Date: 2026-10-11
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · qPAz-qHHgTo
React to this story