APEX Legends ZDT COFFEE TALK GOOD MORNING, FALSE PROPHETS, YELLOW SUBMARINE [ZeroDarkTony]
Mockery, Fear Claims, and Legal Fundraising in ZeroDarkTony Livestream
During a March 6, 2026 livestream, Anthony D’Amato, who broadcasts online as ZeroDarkTony (ZDT), discussed an ongoing dispute with an online personality commonly referred to as “Krackhead Kenny” (KK).Throughout the broadcast, D’Amato described alleged threats against himself and his family while also ridiculing the same individual during commentary.
The stream repeatedly returned to claims of harassment, discussion of legal action, and appeals for viewer donations to support what D’Amato called a “ZDT legal fund.”
The dispute referenced in the broadcast stems from a temporary restraining order (TRO) that D’Amato previously filed in California. The case was later dismissed by the Los Angeles Superior Court, which ruled that California was not the proper jurisdiction.
The jurisdictional issue was examined in a prior report:
California Is Not the Court of the Internet
https://herolightcody.substack.com/p/california-is-not-the-court-of-the
What Happened
During the broadcast, D’Amato described alleged threats and harassment from Krackhead Kenny, the individual he claims has targeted him online. These claims included references to firearms, alleged intimidation involving family members, and suggestions that individuals might appear at his mother’s home.
At the same time, D’Amato mocked KK and rejected accusations that statements in his earlier restraining order filing were inaccurate.
The dispute centers partly on claims that D’Amato falsely stated in the restraining order paperwork that Krackhead Kenny conducted business in California. Critics, including Kenny himself, have characterized those statements as perjury. During the livestream, D’Amato acknowledged the criticism but said any errors could be corrected in a “refiling.”
During the stream, ZeroDarkTony also directed moderators to post Cash App and Venmo links, telling viewers the donations would support legal action connected to the dispute.
The broadcast therefore combined several recurring elements:
- claims of serious threats
- ridicule of the opposing party
- discussion of legal action
- and fundraising tied to litigation
One question remains unaddressed during the broadcast: what became of funds previously raised for earlier promised lawsuits and legal actions?
Exhibits
Exhibit A
Exhibit A captures the streamer confirming that court action will follow, stating: “And this will be addressed in court.” This provides evidence of a formal response to the alleged harassment and threats described in the broadcast.
Timestamp: 00:12:18 – 00:13:02
Exhibit B
In Exhibit B, the streamer asserts the presence of direct evidence, stating: “It specifically identifies me in that threat.” This refers to a supposed “death threat” allegedly targeting Zero Dark Tony.
Timestamp: 00:13:39 – 00:14:20
Exhibit C
In Exhibit C the streamer claims that intimidation tactics are having an impact, with the streamer stating: “Because their intimidation is working.” Further stating that he is hoping a gang member doesn’t end his life, while also stating “They can spin and spiral all they want… it’s coming,” referring to an order of protection.
Timestamp: 00:23:10 – 00:25:17
The statement refers to a civil protection order that D’Amato says he intends to pursue.
The segment also references criticism of statements in the earlier restraining order filing—particularly the claim that the opposing party conducted business in California. D’Amato tells viewers the issue can be corrected in a “refiling.”
The earlier case, however, was dismissed by the Los Angeles Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction.
Exhibit D
Exhibit D addresses the legality of online threats, as the streamer declares: “Because you can’t threaten someone’s life online.”
Timestamp: 00:27:06 – 00:28:50
In this segment, ZeroDarkTony outlines what he says will be a law-enforcement response, predicting that police will issue a warrant and that Krackhead Kenny will ultimately be arrested.
Exhibit E
Exhibit E concerns anticipated witness testimony, with D’Amato describing how he believes a courtroom hearing will unfold.
Timestamp: 00:30:41 – 00:31:31
In the segment, D’Amato says his mother will testify in support of the protection order. He also identifies another potential witness, a frequent livestream chat participant known as “Nikky Fynn.”
During the discussion, ZeroDarkTony narrates how the hearing will supposedly play out, predicting witness testimony, courtroom exchanges, and even how his own attorney will object to questions during the proceeding.
The result is a detailed description of a courtroom scene that has not yet occurred.
Exhibit F
Exhibit F returns to the jurisdiction dispute that surrounded D’Amato’s earlier restraining order filing.
Timestamp: 00:31:51 – 00:32:56
During this segment, D’Amato claims that “Krackhead Kenny” still has done a lot of business in California.
The claim mirrors statements made in the original restraining order paperwork. Critics have argued those statements were false and have accused D’Amato of committing perjury in the filing.
On the livestream, ZeroDarkTony attempts to support the claim by referencing a screenshot that allegedly shows a moderator saying they will visit his mother’s home. D’Amato interprets the alleged moderator message as evidence that Kenny himself maintains business in California.
The jurisdiction argument was central to the earlier case—an argument the court ultimately rejected when it dismissed the filing.
Exhibit G
Exhibit G escalates the dispute further, with Anthony D’Amato (ZeroDarkTony) discussing alleged threats involving a firearm and predicting law enforcement involvement.
“Once it gets from LAPD to that police department, they’re going to investigate that.”
Timestamp: 00:35:40 – 00:36:25
During this segment, D’Amato claims that “Krackhead Kenny” threatened that his son would use a firearm against him. He presents the alleged statement as evidence of a criminal threat and predicts that the matter will be referred from the Los Angeles Police Department to another jurisdiction where KK lives for investigation.
As with other portions of the broadcast, the allegation is framed as part of anticipated legal action, with ZeroDarkTony describing how he believes law enforcement will respond.
Context
We have seen this courtroom fantasy before.
Anthony D’Amato previously filed a temporary restraining order in California describing similar allegations and expectations about an upcoming hearing. The court dismissed the case after determining that California lacked jurisdiction.
That ruling meant the anticipated hearing—and the testimony described on stream—never occurred.
Yet during the March 6 livestream, ZeroDarkTony once again narrates how the courtroom will supposedly unfold, telling viewers that the earlier filing can simply be corrected in a “refiling.”
The pattern is familiar: dramatic courtroom confrontations are described in detail on livestream long before any hearing actually takes place.
Tags: threats, harassment, legal-action, online-safety, 9hzcYdXsmaQ
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Text Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Date: 2026-03-06
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · 9hzcYdXsmaQ
React to this story