Tag: legal fees
-
A judge awarded D’Amato’s lawyers less than half of what they asked Jarred Brooks to pay. That evening, D’Amato told viewers “the truth wins again” and said Brooks had been “court-ordered” to a financial assessment office. The minute order says nothing about one. Jarred Brooks, who represented himself and had his court fees waived, has…
-
D’Amato described serving the wife of Jarred Brooks at her workplace, claimed a judge already found $23,000 in fees reasonable, and said a second fee hearing is set for October 29. The court record shows no ruling on the fees yet.
-
On October 23rd, D’Amato named a spouse, a daughter, and multiple online figures as planned defendants, citing the Ralph Act and the Bane Act
-
Targets he named include Jarred Brooks, known online as Krackhead Kenny, Brooks’s wife and their daughter, and a critic he calls Darren, across a sprawling October 21 YouTube broadcast.
-
On an Oct. 20 driving stream, D’Amato told Jarred Brooks, Brooks’s wife and others by name that they would be sued, and called a $23,197.40 fee request against Brooks money already owed; the judge later awarded $10,725.
-
Two clips from the October 17, 2026, stream document a warning to unnamed “stalkers” who might see D’Amato with his daughter and his prediction that Scott Hochstetter, known online as DOA, will be paying judgments “for the rest of his life.”
-
D’Amato also alleges a nurse (his ex) doxxed his mother during an episode he calls “the whole giggly gage thing,” adding a harassment claim alongside the litigation commentary.
-
Scott Hochstetter’s amended complaint, filed September 11 in California federal court, lists Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr. as a defendant alongside the LAPD and Scientology entities.
-
The October 11 livestream also had him speculating that a rival would have been arrested near a Scientology booth at a public event and setting a $10,000 price on his own testimony.
-
During an October 2, 2026 stream, D’Amato recapped a court fee ruling, described financial disclosure requirements for the opposing party’s spouse, and solicited legal-fund donations toward a planned civil suit.