Category: Legal Coverage
-
The April 17 hearing in D’Amato v. Brooks ended without a ruling. ZeroDarkTony’s team is trying to establish jurisdiction over a Louisiana resident by pointing to his public comment calls into California State Bar teleconference meetings. We break down what happened in court, why that jurisdictional theory faces serious legal problems, and what options Brooks…
-
A Los Angeles live streamer, ZeroDarkTony, returns to the same jurisdictional battlefield that destroyed his first case — this time with a lawyer. It may not be enough.
-
California’s Penal Code 1001.36 was designed to help the genuinely mentally ill avoid unnecessary incarceration. But its legal architecture — a mandatory presumption the prosecution can almost never overcome, combined with a complete erasure of the arrest record on completion — creates a pathway a sophisticated defendant can exploit. Here is how it works, step…
-
For more than a year, Mindy Willens pursued protection from ZeroDarkTony through a system designed to move quickly. Instead, the process dragged on. The outcome secured safety for her family—but not without concessions, and not without cost.
-
ZeroDarkTony aka Streamer Anthony D’Amato and why may have already violated the terms between himself and Mindy Willens – Restraining order case brought by her, against Mr D’Amato regarding his constant abuse of Mindy and her family tormenting and harassing them all for nearly 2 years.
-
A 355-year sentence was meant to ensure Gregory Vogelsang would never be released. Decades later, California’s parole system has approved his release, exposing a deeper contradiction in how the state defines punishment and risk.
-
On January 19, 2026, a California streamer known as ZeroDarkTony, on active probation for multiple violations of a restraining order, broadcast a detailed campaign of workplace threats, mass subpoena intimidation, and financial ruin promises—all live, to a paying audience.