APEX Legends, ZDT CHILLSTREAM DUTCH DUMMY, FACT CHECK, VIOLATION 2026-06-05 14, 23, ZeroDarkTony / June 5, 2026 / YouTube / EO6nVBN9XHk
Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr., also known as ZeroDarkTony, named a paying member of his channel audience during a June 5, 2026 YouTube livestream and stated that a person subject to an active TRO had placed that member’s name in a video title. D’Amato claimed this constituted interference with his income and stated he had already forwarded evidence to his attorney. He announced plans to report the conduct to the presiding judge and to police.
“He’s Not the Only One in That Household That’s Going to Get Sued”
D’Amato described the conduct on stream as targeting of paid channel members to intimidate them away from supporting him financially. He stated, “the respondent has decided again to target one of the members of my audience… this stalker wants to continue to violate and affect my income by targeting my members, not just audience, but paid members of my channel. And he is targeting them to try and intimidate them and scare them from supporting me.” He framed this as part of ongoing legal proceedings, citing a court date he referenced as “the 18th” and stating he had already sent materials to his attorney.
Later in the stream, D’Amato addressed a chatter identified by screen name as “Pren” (@prenfen9226), whom he characterized as a paying member being named in an opposing party’s video titles. He told the chatter directly that the matter had been forwarded to his attorney and would be raised with the judge. He also stated he would file a criminal report over the same conduct. D’Amato said of the respondent, “he’s not the only one in that household that’s going to get sued.”
Exhibit A
D’Amato states on stream that the respondent’s conduct constitutes interference with his paid channel membership and announces his intent to sue: “I’m going to sue this motherfucker’s ass. And here’s just another piece of evidence that a judge is going to say in the future, when I go and sue this piece of shit… I’ve already sent it to the attorney.” He closes the segment with, “This is being reported to the judge.”
Timestamps: 00:03:00 – 00:07:30 | Watch with a free accountD’Amato identifies the conduct as a violation tied to income interference and states he has already transmitted evidence to an attorney. The clip establishes that at the time of the stream, D’Amato characterized the matter as active litigation and named the respondent in the context of a future civil suit. He also makes a reference to other members of the respondent’s household as potential defendants.
Exhibit B
D’Amato states he fears physical escalation and describes the conduct as a TRO violation, then announces, “And this one’s going to the police.”
Timestamps: 00:08:22 – 00:10:17 | Watch with a free accountD’Amato claims the respondent was “told to leave me alone directly by a judge and refuses to do so” and characterizes the video title placement as “coded speech.” He states he intends to file a police report in addition to the judicial reporting announced in the prior segment. The clip records D’Amato’s stated belief that a TRO is currently in effect and that the conduct he describes violates it.
Exhibit C
Addressing the chatter Pren by name, D’Amato confirms the matter has gone to his attorney and states, “I’m reporting it to the judge through my attorney. My attorney’s gonna do it. I don’t like, I said print, I’m reporting it to the judge.” He adds that he will also pursue a criminal report.
Timestamps: 00:23:13 – 00:26:36 | Watch with a free accountD’Amato states on stream that a jurisdiction challenge was denied and that he is not handling the judicial reporting himself, delegating it to counsel. He names a paying audience member publicly while describing the conduct directed at that person. The clip shows D’Amato characterizing the audience-targeting as the basis for both civil and criminal reporting in the same breath.
Taken together, the three clips record D’Amato stating on stream, during what he described as active litigation, that he had forwarded evidence to an attorney, intended to report to the presiding judge, and planned to file a police report, all in connection with the naming of a paid channel member in an opposing party’s video title.
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Text Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Date: 2026-06-05
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · EO6nVBN9XHk
React to this story