SLAAPPPPPPPYYYYYYY MCBOOGAVILLE DOA LEGAL SKILLS KRASHOUT 2026-07-02 [@PinkPuppyClub66] / July 2, 2026 / YouTube / iQvQ74lGKjo
Stream also included co-host commentary on DOA’s 40-page defamation filing and speculation about HLC’s legal help hurting the plaintiffs’ cases.
Meena Khattak, a streamer known as “Sticker Chick” and streaming with the handle “@PinkPuppyClub66” ran a three-hour livestream on her YouTube channel on July 2, joined by co-host @K2theHeat. They moved from mocking a “dismissed” defamation lawsuit to a threat aimed at a named target to a Reddit rumor about who’s secretly feeding information regarding the criminal case involving Anthony Robert D’Amato, Jr., aka ZeroDarkTony, and a restraining order case ZeroDarkTony v. Krackhead Kenny. Most of what they have said about any actual court record is incorrect.
For the actual court record on ZeroDarkTony’s restitution orders, read our article here: Judge Admonishes ZeroDarkTony, Orders Restitution to Victims, and Denies Bid to Escape Court‑Ordered Community Labor – HERO / NOT / ZERO
“He’s gonna feel some pain soon”
About four minutes in, after a run of jokes about a defamation suit filed by Scott Hochstetter (ZeroDarkTony, “DOA”), Sticker Chick said, “Ghost needs to vanish.” K2theHeat answered, addressing the target directly:
“He’s gonna feel some pain soon. I mean, not that he’s not in pain. I’m sorry about that. But I’m not. You’re gonna feel a lot of pain excruciatingly soon. Not whenever I get around to it.”
Exhibit A
An apology, withdrawn in the same breath. Chat picked up the thread immediately: viewer @rosepetal1pinchu wrote “ghost needs to vanish ….we are not done YET…” seconds later. K2theHeat didn’t name the target on stream, but described him in the run-up (mocking his recent videos, his “medication,” his mental state)
Timestamps: 00:03:30 – 00:05:30 | Watch with a free account
The Reddit rumor: Unverified
Later, Sticker Chick read a post from the Scientology Gossip LA subreddit theorizing “Ivor,” one of her chatters and a former moderator for ZeroDarkTony is secretly “HLC,” or Hero Light Cody, who the post blames for feeding the court information that hurt the case brought by [S.], ZeroDarkTony’s minor victim. She endorsed the theory on stream and added her own claim that Enri Marini acted like a “stalker” and was “trying to get Tony… arrested again.”
Exhibit B
@PinkPuppyClub66 reads the Reddit post aloud and then comments: “So whoever helped Kenny and [S.] hurt their cases,” adding her own assessment that Enri appeared “desperate” before the judge. @PinkPuppyClub66 attributes the details to public court record while also acknowledging she heard additional information secondhand. It doesn’t appear that she read the court record at all.
HeroNotZero isn’t confirming or denying who HLC is. On stream, Ivor’s own account pushed back on the premise itself: “Like HLC sabotaged a bunch of people?” Beyond that one line, chat mostly didn’t engage with the claims or the merits. In the minutes around the segment, the thread ran on birthday wishes for another viewer, jokes about a co-host’s RV purchase, a plug for a fundraiser, and a bit about a “Love After DOA” reality show pitch, not the restitution numbers or the Marini filing.
Sticker Chick’s own on-stream account of what “Enri” actually did doesn’t match the court file.
Timestamps: 00:48:12 – 00:51:26 | Watch with a free account
What the restitution order actually says
Sticker Chick told her audience that the minor victim’s mother, asked for roughly $59,000 in restitution from ZeroDarkTony and got back about $6,000, and blamed the shortfall on missing receipts. Not true.
The minute order from the June 26, 2026 restitution hearing in People v. Anthony Robert ZeroDarkTony (Case No. 24CJCM07073-01, Dept. 51, Hon. Jannet Perez Santiso) says something else. Total restitution ordered: $7,757.91.
- Attorney fees (civil attorney): $1,050
- Process server fees: $694.92
- Psychological fees already incurred: $1,800
- Security system and cameras: $199.99, plus $4,013 installation
The only amount denied was $22,100 in future therapy costs, and the court denied that without prejudice, meaning [S.’s mother] can ask for it again later. It wasn’t rejected on the merits. Everything already incurred got awarded. The court referred ZeroDarkTony to the financial evaluator’s office so that he could make payment.
Separately, the court turned down ZeroDarkTony’s request to convert court-ordered community labor to community service, even though he submitted paperwork regarding a pinched nerve in his neck. ZeroDarkTony had not completed any court ordered community labor hours.
HeroNotZero couldn’t find any court document supporting the $59,000 figure, and it doesn’t reconcile with the $7,757.91 the court actually ordered. If that number exists somewhere in the record, we’ll update this piece. Right now, it doesn’t match the docket.
Another order from the same day admonished ZeroDarkTony to comply with every term of his probation, including the criminal protective order, and continued his progress report to July 31, 2026.
What actually happened with the “Enri” filing
Sticker Chick’s version conflates two different things in the docket.
The probation-violation motion that got ZeroDarkTony admonished by the court was filed April 24, 2026 by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office, specifically Deputy City Attorney Ethan Greene, on behalf of the People, not by Enri Marini. It laid out a pattern of alleged violations, including threats aimed at named individuals online, and asked the court to weigh them together. The judge admonished ZeroDarkTony as a result. HeroNotZero isn’t detailing the individual exhibits here; the underlying conduct is on the record and covered in another article.
What Marini actually filed, on May 8, 2026, was a request to reassign the case back to Judge Cooley, a “Verified Statement of Disqualification” under Code of Civil Procedure § 170.3 due to the judge’s relationship inside the LAPD. Judge Jannet Perez Santiso struck it on May 18, 2026, on three separate grounds: Marini is a witness and restraining-order holder in an unrelated case, not a party to this one, so he had no standing to file it; the statement was missing the required perjury certification; and taken on the merits, she said it didn’t clear the legal bar for disqualification based on an appearance of bias.
That’s a request to move a case to a different judge, rejected on paperwork and standing grounds. It is not a stalking campaign to get ZeroDarkTony re-arrested as Sticker Chick asserted.
The bottom line
Sticker Chick framed both claims as coming from the court record, while also saying on stream, “I did not hear this from Tony… I actually do not talk directly to Tony at all,” and crediting Scientology Gossip LA and secondhand chatter instead. Wherever it came from, it isn’t what the court actually ordered.
HeroNotZero will keep tracking People v. ZeroDarkTony (24CJCM07073-01). The next progress report is set for July 31, 2026.
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Text Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Chat Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Date: 2026-07-02
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · iQvQ74lGKjo
React to this story