ZDT CHILLSTREAM PEARL CLUTCHERS, TRUTH SERUM, CROSSROADS [ZeroDarkTony] / September 1, 2026 / YouTube / 7GrlGNKFwFY
Stream also includes a derogatory reference to DOS, who he identified as the “Dutch pig,” a claim that AI-generated sexual images constitute a felony, and a live poll asking viewers to confirm D’Amato’s claimed danger.
Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr., also known as ZeroDarkTony, spent a September 1, 2026 YouTube livestream directing sustained commentary at a woman he identified by name as Becky, whom he accused of co-signing harassment, moderating a chat in which doxxing occurred, and contributing to what he called a threat environment against him. D’Amato described a separate individual connected to the dispute as the “respondent,” stating on stream that this person now faces “criminal charges out of another state” and “three separate parts of the country.” The stream also included references to a standing five-year court order, a claim that AI-generated sexual images of D’Amato constitute a felony, and a live audience poll asking viewers to signal whether calling him a “PDF” creates a threat environment.
“There Is Going to Come a Time Where, Unfortunately for Her, There Will Be My Response”
D’Amato repeatedly characterized Becky’s conduct as co-signing harassment by a “respondent” subject to a court order directing no indirect or direct contact with D’Amato. He stated that as a result of ongoing violations, the respondent now faces criminal charges across multiple jurisdictions. D’Amato then turned to Becky directly, saying she “is absolutely a part of this lie that people want to continue to perpetrate,” before stating that while nobody is currently threatening anyone, a future personal response from him was coming to “protect myself and my family.” Later in the stream, D’Amato addressed a woman he referred to as the “Dutch pig,” referring to DOS, his former mod, calling her a doxer and stating that Becky “supports doxers, grape apologists, stalkers.” He addressed DOS directly, saying: “Hey, DOS, how does it feel that no man’s ever going to want to touch you? Because I’ve seen you before.” He separately paraphrased Becky as having said “I gotta do what I gotta do” and characterized that phrasing as a threat, arguing it was “actionable” given Becky’s connection to the person he holds a five-year order against.
Exhibit A
D’Amato states that while “nobody is threatening anyone,” a future response from him is coming: “there is going to come a time where, unfortunately for her, for her actions, there will be my response. And that will be to protect myself and my family because I’m not doing it.”
Timestamps: 00:11:11 – 00:14:37 | Open clip in new tab
D’Amato frames the statement as self-defense, prefacing it with the denial “nobody is threatening anyone” and framing any future action as protective. The clip also references a court order requiring a respondent (Krackhead Kenny) to “leave ZDT alone,” which D’Amato claims is being violated, and states the respondent has accumulated criminal charges across three states. D’Amato repeated the retaliation warning later in the stream, adding a body-shaming insult.
Exhibit C
D’Amato interprets Becky’s reported phrase “I gotta do what I gotta do” as a threat against him, telling his audience: “well, that sounds like a threat to me. That sounds more like a threat than taking civil action against somebody.”
Timestamps: 00:31:25 – 00:33:29 | Open clip in new tab
D’Amato characterizes the phrase as an actionable statement rather than making a direct counter-threat himself here. The clip is notable as the first explicit moment in which D’Amato signals he intends to use Becky’s own words as the basis for legal or reputational action.
Exhibit F
D’Amato tells his chat that Becky’s conduct “fed into” something dangerous for his personal safety and states: “what Becky did contributed to the environment where my lawyer got followed to his house and where I get followed to places that I go. Becky contributed to that. I hope she’s happy about that.”
Timestamps: 01:00:12 – 01:02:13 | Open clip in new tab
D’Amato’s assertion that Becky caused his lawyer to be followed is presented as a factual claim. The claim is D’Amato’s own on-stream statement and is not corroborated by any other source within the broadcast.
Exhibit H
D’Amato characterizes Becky’s paraphrased statement “I have to do what I have to do” as a legally actionable threat: “when you say something like I’ll have to do what I have to do, that’s a threat. That’s very clearly a threat. And it’s actually an actionable threat, considering her connections to somebody that I have a five-year order against.”
Timestamps: 01:23:57 – 01:26:05 | Open clip in new tab
D’Amato explicitly links his characterization of Becky’s phrasing to the existence of a five-year protective order, framing the connection as what makes the statement actionable. This is the clearest on-stream articulation of D’Amato’s stated legal theory regarding Becky’s conduct.
Exhibit I
D’Amato accuses Becky of permitting doxxing as a moderator: “how disgusting to sit there and act with and come from some sort of moral high ground and be a mod in that chat and let all that doxing and all that garbage go on in there.”
Timestamps: 01:28:13 – 01:32:10 | Open clip in new tab
D’Amato names multiple people he claims were doxxed in Becky’s moderated chat, including Mina and Shelby. The accusation of moderator complicity in doxxing is D’Amato’s stated claim and is not independently corroborated in this clip.
Taken together, the five clips document a sustained, named targeting of Becky across more than 80 minutes of broadcast, combining accusations of legal wrongdoing, claims of causal responsibility for physical surveillance of D’Amato and his lawyer, and statements that a personal response to her conduct is forthcoming.
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript
- Full Text Transcript
- Full Chat Transcript
- Date: 2026-09-01
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · 7GrlGNKFwFY