ZDT NIGHTSHIFT THE LYIN’ KING, DOA DENIED, PLIERS [ZeroDarkTony] / August 31, 2026 / YouTube / dJcvlGaZ7_E

A copyright strike issued the same day is framed as future court evidence.

Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr., also known as ZeroDarkTony, devoted a substantial portion of an August 31, 2026 YouTube livestream to discussing active and anticipated legal proceedings against multiple individuals. He stated his intention to subpoena a person he identified as Becky, described a separate target as heading toward a two-year jail sentence, and announced that a copyright strike had been filed that day and would serve as evidence in litigation.

“She Should Have Never Called Me That, But She Will Be Brought into Court”

D’Amato’s stated basis for subpoenaing Becky was her having called him a “PDF” on her public program. He framed the subpoena as both unavoidable and retaliatory: “She should have never called me that, but she will be brought into court. Period.” He went on to describe Becky’s account as already placed “on the list of subpoenas” and said his team would pull videos from that account. He acknowledged uncertainty about her ultimate status in the proceedings: “I’m not quite sure yet whether we’re going to make her a respondent so that she gets sued, right? Or if she’ll be a witness. But one way or the other, she’s going in the pool with everybody else.” On the separate matter, D’Amato predicted a criminal sentence and framed Scott as solely responsible for “hundreds of thousands of dollars of city resources being wasted.” He also referenced a restraining order he stated he had obtained, saying the judge in that proceeding “saw the lies.” He further invoked the Cassie v. Diddy civil case as an analogy for how civil proceedings can precede and feed into criminal charges, applying that framework to his own situation. Regarding the copyright strike, D’Amato stated: “I issued a copyright strike to one of the dumbasses who continues to put my videos up and use my content and interfere with my income with slander, false light, harassment,” and described the strike as something “which will be evidence.”

That copyright strike was issued against this publication’s YouTube Channel, @heronotzeronetwork. We have already submitted a counter notification, challenging the take

Exhibit A

D’Amato states, “You’re gonna get subpoenaed too,” addressing Becky by name and declaring, “We’re going to subpoena Becky, too, because we have to.” He describes Becky’s account as being on a subpoena list and says the proceedings will compel her to explain her statements on the stand.

Timestamps: 00:13:35 – 00:22:44 | Open clip in new tab

This segment contains D’Amato’s most explicit articulation of his intent to bring Becky into litigation, specifically because of public statements she made about him. He stated he is “not trying to start trouble” and that the subpoena is something he “has to” pursue, framing the action as legally necessary rather than purely punitive, though in the same breath he described her as “this dumb pig” and said “there’s consequences for her actions.” The clip also contains the copyright strike announcement, where D’Amato states on stream that the strike filed that day “will be evidence.”

Exhibit B

D’Amato references the restraining order he claimed to have obtained, stating the judge “saw the lies,” and draws an analogy to civil litigation preceding criminal charges: “After after I forgot her name, Cassie, after Cassie put up the lawsuit for Diddy.”

Timestamps: 00:26:08 – 00:29:22 | Open clip in new tab

D’Amato claims a restraining order he obtained was validated when the judge observed what D’Amato characterized as dishonesty. He extends the Cassie-Diddy analogy to predict that civil proceedings in his own disputes will surface a pattern that leads to further consequences for those he is pursuing. Taken together, the two clips document D’Amato publicly naming a subpoena target, asserting a restraining order, announcing a same-day copyright action framed as litigation evidence, and predicting criminal outcomes for a named respondent, all stated on a public livestream on August 31, 2026.

Sources

Do you like this article? Share it! Give it a like! If this article helped you, informed you, or made you laugh, consider tipping the work.


Leave a Reply

0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest

0
What do you think? Leave a comment!x
()
x