2024-06-06 – Apex Legends, CPS LIVE RIP Marcelis, Danny the Feeder, DOA fails, Jessica the Predator / June 6, 2024 / YouTube / pV1kKv0mSMY
Stream also included stated plans for a memorial event targeting a deceased man and announced contact with private investigators to reach an ex-wife.
Anthony R. D’Amato, Jr., also known as ZeroDarkTony, conducted a live call to Child Protective Services, issued repeated on-stream threats of civil litigation against a minor’s family, and asked his audience to contact Hollywood Police Department during a June 6, 2024 YouTube livestream. D’Amato also announced that his investigators would contact a woman identified as the ex-wife of William Gude aka “Streets,” and stated plans for a June 15 “tribute event” tied to the death of Marcelis, William Gude’s son who was shot and killed. D’Amato has targeted deceased family members of his targets in many broadcasts.
D’Amato framed the broadcast as a response to what he described as harassment and legal filings directed at him. He claimed to hold status as a mandated reporter and an ordained minister in California, and argued those designations shielded him from the legal actions he said opponents were preparing. Prior filings against him, he stated, had already been dismissed.
“I Will Bend Your Fucking Universe Because Look at How Triggered You Are Already”
D’Amato opened the stream with a sustained address to “Streets,” warning that escalating pressure would be met with escalation of his own. He announced the June 15 Marcelis event as a conditional threat, stating he would cancel it if opposition stopped. He then confirmed on stream that he had placed a live CPS call, telling viewers he had “enhanced the report” to include additional named individuals, and that the same CPS agent who handled a prior report had taken the call. Later in the stream, D’Amato told viewers: “It would be very helpful if you guys called Hollywood PD and reported this… you could be anonymous.” He framed this as supplemental to his own filings, though the request was made directly to his live audience in the context of an ongoing dispute.
Exhibit A
D’Amato tells his audience that any attempt to challenge his speech will result in escalation, saying: “If you want to get in the way of my free speech, I’m gonna turn the shit up… I will bend your universe boy. You understand me. I will bend your fucking universe.” He also announces plans for the June 15 event and states he intends to have his investigators contact Streets’s ex-wife, describing her as someone he has “a lot of contact information on.”
Timestamps: 00:03:13 – 00:19:16 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato conditions the June 15 event on whether “Streets” stops what D’Amato characterizes as threats, framing it as leverage. The stated intent to have investigators reach the ex-wife is presented alongside no stated welfare or reporting purpose, only that it will upset Streets.
Exhibit B
D’Amato states that because opponents have continued their activity, Aaron Smith Levin will now be named in the CPS report: “Now it’s gonna drag Aaron back into it… now I’m gonna have to mention to CPS how Aaron was involved before… In turn that could trigger an investigation into him at CPS in Florida into his own family.” He attributes responsibility for that consequence to Streets.
Timestamps: 00:20:08 – 00:27:28 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato presents the addition of a third party to a CPS report as a consequence of opponents’ continued behavior, not as an independent filing decision. The clip records D’Amato announcing on stream, before a live audience, that a named person will be added to an active CPS report.
Exhibit C
D’Amato states he is preparing a live call to CPS, telling viewers “I’m just like sitting here excited. Excited to call.” He also argues that a police report filed by a minor named [S.] was itself retaliatory, claiming: “I am protected by California law. So, any reports that solid the report that [S.] made is retaliatory.”
Timestamps: 00:29:34 – 00:35:24 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato announces the pending CPS call as a scheduled event for live audience participation, distinct from a private filing. His claim of California ministerial protection for mandated-reporter status is stated as personal legal opinion, not as a verified legal finding.
Exhibit D
D’Amato confirms on stream that the live CPS call was completed, stating: “I have now enhanced the report, added William, let them know about Danny and Jessica, and they already had a report open. It’s the same agent that I spoke with before… William has been reported to all these. I have told everyone about the other back to Gomez.”
Timestamps: 00:52:56 – 00:55:57 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato confirms the call was placed and that the report now includes additional named individuals. The clip also shows D’Amato displaying what he describes as a chart mapping named individuals to agencies including CPS, ICE, and multiple police departments.
Exhibit E
D’Amato reflects on the ongoing CPS filings, saying: “ever since I started reporting them to cps and things with uh [S.] this shit has gone down way downhill.” He frames the reports as the trigger for what he describes as his opponents’ accelerating internal conflict.
Timestamps: 01:12:24 – 01:14:14 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato characterizes the CPS reports as having a destabilizing effect on the opposing group while framing his own filing conduct as a mirrored response to what was done to him. The clip documents D’Amato articulating a retaliatory logic for the reports on stream.
Exhibit F
D’Amato references a civil elder abuse case he says Streets is currently a defendant in, stating: “Streets is being sued for elder abuse. And he’s not telling anybody… fucking like almost 60 filings about this elder abuse case.” He then announces the “Marcelis piñata” event as a further escalation if Streets continues.
Timestamps: 01:17:57 – 01:19:41 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato’s claim about the elder abuse case is stated as a fact on stream; its accuracy is not independently verified in the available source material. The clip records D’Amato linking disclosure of that case to his escalation calculus for the June 15 event.
Exhibit G
D’Amato addresses chat members who sent messages D’Amato found threatening, telling his audience: “you either de-escalate this motherfucker or it is going to be awful for you not on this platform either. Yeah, it’s going to just be horrible elsewhere. Because we’re going to talk about it.” He also tells opponents to “roll up,” framing further online antagonism as an invitation to confront him in person.
Timestamps: 01:33:14 – 01:37:45 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato frames the “roll up” language as a challenge issued to online critics who, in his framing, are unwilling to act on their words. The threat of escalation “elsewhere” is conditional on continued chat activity, not stated as an unconditional action.
Exhibit H
D’Amato proposes a boxing or sparring event directed at two named individuals, saying: “Confident chris, we’ll see what happens. Would you like to get into a ring with me, Confident Chris or Danny, would you?… You come into a ring. I’m standing in there. Let’s not even make it a fight. I’m standing in the middle. I have my hands at my side. I’m just standing there. You make a move and then we see what happens.”
Timestamps: 01:48:43 – 01:51:48 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato frames the proposal as a structured, refereed event with rules, not as an unscheduled physical confrontation. The challenge is directed at two named individuals who D’Amato confirms are adults.
Exhibit I
D’Amato addresses on-stream reports about [S.], then pivots to a stated plan: “Maybe we’re gonna have to find a relative of this little punk-ass bitch. Which maybe his mother, maybe we should do assault. Maybe we should do a [S.]’s mom day.” He adds that he has already notified Detective Gomez about threats to come to his home.
Timestamps: 02:47:13 – 02:51:36 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states this as a tentative idea framed as a counter to [S.]’s online conduct, not as a scheduled action. The clip records D’Amato explicitly considering a minor’s parent as a target of stream coverage in response to the minor’s activity.
Exhibit J
D’Amato describes his approach to the ongoing dispute, saying: “if someone tries to fuck me over I’m gonna fuck back. I may stop after a while and just let it go and give it up, but I will fuck back and that’s what I’m doing now.”
Timestamps: 02:56:29 – 02:58:34 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato acknowledges he does not want to pursue the actions he has described but presents provocation as the operative condition. The clip captures him stating the retaliatory logic governing the stream’s CPS calls and escalation announcements in his own words.
Exhibit K
D’Amato announces a scheduled call to immigration authorities, saying: “We’re gonna call immigration tomorrow. We have a phone appointment.” He identifies the basis as his claim that an “illegal immigrant” was present with the group and was “getting arrested.”
Timestamps: 03:15:56 – 03:17:49 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states the immigration call as a scheduled appointment, presenting it as another agency contact in the same series as the CPS and police reports. The underlying claim about the individual’s immigration status is asserted by D’Amato on stream without cited documentation.
Exhibit L
D’Amato announces on stream that he plans to contact Streets’s ex-wife’s attorney. “We’re gonna be calling Francois Koster’s attorney so that she could have a lot of the information that maybe got passed her about streets of this child… that’s a way for me to really hit streets where it hurts if he wants to fucking threaten me.”
Timestamps: 03:23:42 – 03:25:26 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato explicitly frames contacting an opposing party’s attorney as a means of causing harm to Streets rather than as a legal or reporting purpose. He conditions proceeding on audience engagement, telling viewers to hit the like button before the call.
Exhibit M
D’Amato warns [S.] that proceeding with legal filings will put his conduct on public record, saying: “it’s gonna look real bad if you pull me in the court and we show the CPS reports and what you’ve been doing [S.]. Because that’s gonna go on public record now.”
Timestamps: 03:42:03 – 03:45:24 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato addresses the minor directly by name on a public stream, using CPS filings and court records as leverage against legal action. The clip records D’Amato presenting the prospect of public exposure as a deterrent to [S.]’s family pursuing a restraining order.
Exhibit N
D’Amato argues his mandated reporter status insulates him from the retaliatory filings he says Streets is preparing, stating: “I’m a mandated reporter and he’s retaliating against me after I reported him to CPS and announced it.” He confirms he will update the CPS supervisor the following day.
Timestamps: 04:04:26 – 04:06:13 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato’s legal claims about mandated reporter protections are stated as personal assertions on stream, not verified legal findings. The clip records him laying out his theory of protection while announcing further agency contact.
Exhibit O
D’Amato tells [S.]’s family that filing any legal paperwork will result in a civil suit against their homeowner’s insurance, saying: “We could file a lawsuit against the insurance company for this negligence of the parents… I could go after like his parents’ insurance… we will take appropriate action.” He also states his own lawyer will handle any court appearance by video.
Timestamps: 04:08:36 – 04:15:44 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato conditions the lawsuit on [S.]’s family proceeding with restraining order paperwork, framing it explicitly as a financial deterrent. The clip also records him sending crowd-facing cues, including a request for audience to confirm his litigation theory in chat.
Exhibit P
D’Amato confirms that his show’s producer is separately forwarding material to Detective Gomez, saying: “DOS will tell you that she emails detective Gomez because she has… the producer of this show has the email and is in contact with detective Gomez sending information as well.” He then tells his audience: “It would be very helpful if you guys called Hollywood PD and reported this… you could be anonymous.”
Timestamps: 04:23:53 – 04:35:24 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato asks his live audience to place calls to Hollywood PD in connection with an ongoing personal dispute, framing it as supplemental to his own reports. He also states in this clip that he has evidence of Jessica “corrupting a minor” and has relayed that to Detective Gomez.
Exhibit Q
D’Amato issues a direct on-stream warning to [S.], saying: “I’m gonna fucking sue your family for it… I’ve got CPS reports and I got a hundred witnesses here in my chat… your parents are… wow, they’re going through a divorce so they need divorce lawyers now… for them to have a lawsuit dropped in their lap, which will happen within the next fucking 60 days motherfucker.” He also asks viewers to put a “1” in chat if they agree he will get a judgment.
Timestamps: 04:36:18 – 04:45:01 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states a 60-day litigation timeline on stream and identifies the opposing family’s divorce and insurance coverage as compounding vulnerabilities. The audience participation prompt turns an announced legal threat into a shared call-and-response with the live chat.
Exhibit R
D’Amato states his intent to sue if served with any legal papers, telling opponents: “if you serve me with any fucking papers I’m telling you we will sue your insurance company of your fucking house because you’re a minor… This is a this is lawsuit shit. This is exactly what lawsuits are made for boy.”
Timestamps: 04:47:26 – 04:51:06 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato acknowledges in the same clip that the fight challenge discussed in Exhibit H was “just me talking shit” and that medical circumstances preclude it, creating a distinction between the physical challenge and the legal threats, which he reaffirms as serious. The lawsuit threat is stated as conditional on service of papers, not as an already-filed action.
Exhibit S
D’Amato accuses Danny of attempting to use a third-party TikTok account to reveal D’Amato’s real name, saying: “he wants to put my name on Aja’s tiktok to dox me because of his inadequacy.” He frames this as part of the broader retaliatory conduct he has been describing throughout the stream.
Timestamps: 04:51:55 – 04:56:28 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato’s claim about the TikTok doxxing attempt is an on-stream assertion; no supporting documentation is shown in the clip. The allegation is presented as additional grounds for the litigation and CPS escalation described elsewhere in the broadcast.
Exhibit T
D’Amato addresses the prospect of a stalking charge, saying: “They’re gonna have to explain where when and how I am stalking him… you should tell your mother that I said that before you file any paperwork you dumb fucks.”
Timestamps: 05:31:28 – 05:33:18 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato addresses [S.]’s mother directly by role on a public stream, attaching a financial warning to what he characterizes as legal deterrence. The clip records him repeating the insurance lawsuit threat in abbreviated form as a closing argument to an extended segment.
Exhibit U
D’Amato tells his audience he has already consulted a lawyer about a suit against [S.]’s parents, saying: “This is retaliation. They’re retaliating. I’ve said it a hundred times… Streets is just trying to jam me up with paperwork and put his this kid’s mother in a very bad position… they’re going to have to hire a very expensive lawyer to defend against a complicated insurance case.”
Timestamps: 05:41:44 – 05:44:57 | Watch with a free account
D’Amato states that separate specialist lawyers will be needed for the insurance case and the CPS matters, framing financial attrition as an intended outcome. The clip closes the stream’s legal segment by itemizing projected costs for the opposing family on a public broadcast. Across more than five hours of documented footage, D’Amato placed a live on-stream CPS call, announced planned contacts with immigration authorities and a private attorney, solicited audience calls to Hollywood PD, and repeatedly stated his intent to sue a minor’s parents’ homeowner’s insurance if any restraining order paperwork was filed against him.
Sources
- Original YouTube Video
- Full SRT Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Full Text Transcript: for HNZ Supporters
- Date: 2024-06-06
- Stream ID: YOUTUBE · pV1kKv0mSMY
React to this story